Here, have a look at an article recently posted in my school's alumni page. Keep an open mind and tell me that kid is good.
An atheist professor of philosophy speaks to his class on the problem science has with God, The Almighty.
He asks one of his new students to stand and.....
Prof: So you believe in God?
Student: Absolutely, sir.
Prof: Is God good?
Student: Sure.
Prof: Is God all-powerful?
Student: Yes.
Prof: My brother died of cancer even though he prayed to God to heal him.
Most of us would attempt to help others who are ill. But God didn't. How is this God good then? Hmm?
Student: (Student is silent.)
Prof: You can't answer, can you? Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?
Student: Yes.
Prof: Is Satan good?
Student: No.
Prof: Where does Satan come from?
Student: From...God...
Prof: That's right. Tell me son, is there evil in this world?
Student: Yes.
Prof: Evil is everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything. Correct?
Student: Yes.
Prof: So who created evil?
Student: (Student does not answer.)
Prof: Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things exist in the world, don't they?
Student: Yes, sir.
Prof: So, who created them?
Student: (Student has no answer.)
Prof: Science says you have 5 senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Tell me, son...Have you ever seen God?
Student: No, sir.
Prof: Tell us if you have ever heard your God?
Student: No , sir.
Prof: Have you ever felt your God, tasted your God, smelt your God? Have you ever had any sensory perception of God for that matter?
Student: No, sir. I'm afraid I haven't.
Prof: Yet you still believe in Him?
Student: Yes.
Prof: According to empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your GOD doesn't exist. What do you say to that, son?
Student: Nothing. I only have my faith.
Prof: Yes. Faith. And that is the problem science has.
Student: Professor, is there such a thing as heat?
Prof: Yes.
Student: And is there such a thing as cold?
Prof: Yes.
Student: No sir. There isn't. (The lecture theatre becomes very quiet with this turn of events.)
Student: Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more heat, superheat, mega heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat. But we don't have anything called cold.
We can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that.
There is no such thing as cold. Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat.
We cannot measure cold. Heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it. (There is pin-drop silence in the lecture theatre.)
Student: What about darkness, Professor? Is there such a thing as darkness?
Prof: Yes. What is night if there isn't darkness?
Student: You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is the absence of something.
You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light....But if you have no light constantly, you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it?
In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?
Prof: So what is the point you are making, young man?
Student: Sir, my point is your philosophical premise is flawed.
Prof: Flawed? Can you explain how?
Student: Sir, you are working on the premise of duality. You argue there is life and then there is death, a good God and a bad God.
You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure.
Sir, science can't even explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one.
To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing.
Death is not the opposite of life: just the absence of it.
Now tell me, Professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?
Prof: If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, yes, of course, I do.
Student: Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?
Prof: (The Professor shakes his head with a smile, beginning to realize where the argument is going.)
Student: Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavour, are you not teaching your opinion, sir?
Are you not a scientist but a preacher?
Prof: (The class is in uproar.)
Student: Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the Professor's brain?
Prof: (The class breaks out into laughter.)
Student: Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor's brain, felt it, touched or smelt it?.....No one appears to have done so.
So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, sir.
With all due respect, sir, how do we then trust your lectures, sir?
Prof: (The room is silent. The professor stares at the student, his face unfathomable.)
Prof: I guess you'll have to take them on faith, son.
Student: That is it sir.. The link between man & God is FAITH. That is all that keeps things moving & alive.
hahahah, now is that good or what? That kid got balls. Although his logic makes sense, it is the prof's flawed logic that defeats him. He cannot use science to defeat a non-science. Thue to the adage "Fight fire with fire", he should have used a pureply philosophical argument if he wants to win his argument. Therein lies the problem...
Science has always tried to quantify the Universe in order to understand it more. And religious folks uses religion to understand it. Arguably, science produce more immediate results and very concrete and convincing facts about the world around us, while religion tend to harp on the need to accept on faith. In this case, both of them are correct and both of them are wrong. Looking strictly from an onjective point of view, God could not exist, or if to be presented a little more mildly, we (the humans) are not the children of God.
Consider the extend of our Universe. Billions of worlds on billion of galaxies. What make you think that we are the Chosen one? Assume that God did create us...let's take it to the next logical question: Who then created God? If there is an answer, let us hypothetically assume is God's God, then "Who created God's God?" would be the next logical question. This is neverending. If some smark alec answers that "God is just is without other creator beings...", then wouldn't it stand to reason that the Universe (and the humans in it) "...is jut is...without creator beings"? You see where this is leading?
My take of the Question? Well, religion is a tool/product of human imagination designed to calm and bind disparate human ideals into a cohesive force capable of surviving in a hostile world. And the world was hostile back when religion first started...
Why flutter at all when by common sense, it should've been pushed all the way back as the wind pushes. Look at this. And common sense tells us that it will stay that way as long as the wind blows.
But it didn't happen this way becouse of a phenomenon called back pressure or rather reverse flow. It is a reality of fluid flow to induce turbulance when it came upon an obstuction. In this case, the backflow creates enough force to push the paper back against the prevailing wind. However the back flow occurs as circular flow as shown below and the strength decreases when the "circle" was blown away, thus the paper are now being pushed again by the prevailing wind. BUT, as the wind picks up, another "circle" forms and the backflow happens again. This happens many times a minute, even seconds and this accounts for the fluttering or vibrations you see when paper or cloths were blown by the wind.
